Two envisaged events have a causal relationship between them; if the first happens, it will ‘cause’ the second to happen. Either both will be actualised, or neither will.
In English, it is communicated with the word if. The condition can be hypothetical (contrary to fact) or have a degree of uncertainty (potential fact).
Contrary to fact:
Potential fact:
These examples are suggested by Steve looking at old grammar work on HA without access to language helpers.
This example is from Philip's hortatory DA under Alternation. Steve thinks it is better filed here as condition-consequence.
The Kovol language can do a contrary to fact condition-consequence relationship.
A hypothetical condition can be given as a proposition followed by aga. The consequence that does not happen is also followed by an aga.
condition (that didn't happen) aga consequence (that didn't happen) aga.
A potential to fact condition-consequence relation may be established by the juxtaposition of clauses in the future tense.
Medium (Contrary to fact)
Contrary to fact condition-consequence relationships were part of Steve's final CLA grammar check. He didn't get it at the time, but Silas used an aga construction that Steve then looked into and found a pattern. Looking back it was seen in a DA text.
Steve and Philip didn't see much in DA.
Low (Potential fact)
Potential fact condition-consequence relationships are intuited by the team. In English we would use the word if for these sentences, and that makes us think there might be an implicit relationship there.
Our instinct is that the juxtaposition of two clauses can communicate an if relationship. Saying something like "it will not rain, I will go. It will rain, I will not go." might work.